Google Corners 2/3 of US Search Market

5 comments

According to CNN, which is according to Fortune, which is according to Hitwise, which is according to some estimation.
The story

Comments

-

Does anyone here add Yahoo/MSN/Ask search boxes to their websites to try and get people in the habit of using alternative search engines?

>Does anyone here add

>>Does anyone here add Yahoo/MSN/Ask search boxes to their websites

Yes, I used to do it more but I still try to use an alternative SE for site search whenever possible.

Me goog all the way. I use

Me goog all the way. I use yahoo for backlinks etc. If goog did that properly I would not even go to Yahoo.

Trying to switch to yahoo... but...

Lol. In my Firefox bookmark bar I changed to Yahoo a while ago, but it keeps Google's ico anyway:

I find that I'm actually checking out some of the main stories on the main page's "featured" tab from time to time. However the results just don't seem to be as good as Google yet.

If I wanted to read up on the wikipedia guide lines, (yes wiki is a general term), I probably want Wikipedia's guidelines as they are the most well known/popular wiki out there.

Yahoo supplies a more general Wikipedia page in the top 4 of this search:
http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=wiki+guidelines
"en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki"

Google on the other hand, serves up exactly what I want, albeit a bit low in the rankings (rank 6):
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=wiki+guidelines
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Policies_and_guidelines

Both on page one, good. Both within a few ranking of each other, good. But Google gave me a page that was a bit more on the relevant side.

Yahoo tried, as "guidelines" was one of the first words captured from the cached version of the page. However where else was it on the rest of the page?
http://216.109.125.130/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&p=wiki+guidelines&u=en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki&w=wiki+guidelines&d=RXDVavmdOkye&icp=1&.intl=us

"guidelines" is all over the cached version that Google had, even in the URL of the page that was indexed:
http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:g3h5jpAwDqkJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Policies_and_guidelines+wiki+guidelines&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=6&gl=us

So... you have to ask, did Yahoo index the page that Google and I found more relevant for this search? Yep.
http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=en.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FWikipedia%3APolicies_and_guidelines&fr=yfp-t-501&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8

While this is only one example, this is the overall problem that many engines have. They don't "seem" as relevant. I'm sure they work hard to have relevant searches, and there are certainly searches that go one way or the other. But it is perceived that more of the time, Google gets it right. So in the instances where other engines get it wrong, it is more of a let down in attempting to try those other engines.

>>Does anyone here add

>>>Does anyone here add Yahoo/MSN/Ask search boxes to their websites

>>Yes, I used to do it more but I still try to use an alternative SE for site search whenever possible.

Why don't they pay for that? Every user who sticks must be worth big bucks in cpc.

Give me 5 bucks for each person who clicks and I'll put it on all my sites :)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.