A rebuttal of Phil Craven's "Google Explained"

2 comments
Thread Title:
A rebuttal of Phil Craven's "Google Explained"
Thread Description:

Comments are directed only at his PageRank explanation.

>>>His analysis is flawed, as are all the others he refers to, and many more that I have read. The chief problem with all these analytical papers is that they assume or arbitrate a closed system to preserve a PR average of 1.0. Google isn't doing that. The Web is an open system, not a closed system. Hence, any closed-system model will diverge from Google's practical application.

A very good read!

Comments

The problem here is perhaps t

The problem here is perhaps that he's making a modern analysis of an already very old analysis of an even older algorithm.

Phil's paper has been up a few years already - Google behaved very different as a search engine when it was written - those were the days of monthly dances etc.

Whether it was every conceptually flawed or not, it was one of the major analyses on Google PageRank when Google PageRank was a very real concern, and I believe it gave good indicator of how Google actually behaved on a practical level.

To try and take that original analysis out of its rightful context and apply it to a different contemporary environment just seems pointless.

Much as I respect Michael Martinez's online work in science fiction and fantasy, I find his analysis of Phil's original analysis to be little more than irrelevant. Sorry. :)

Ammon Johns investigates

and reviews Michael's points here:

http://www.cre8asiteforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=114469#114469

"Brin and Page did not suggest that the damping factor need not be applied to all pages, as Mr Martinez erroneously asserts. Instead, they suggested that a numeric damping factor need not be used at all, and that one could use a page (kinda like using a comparison filter) as the damping factor, which would allow for personalization, perhaps even localization or topical-filtering.

I never heard that some people figured Yahoo had no damping factor, but if they did, I'd have ignored them as not understanding the theory or the papers properly."

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.